Post plays with fascist fire

Local elections launch

You may not have realised, but there are local elections in Bristol on June 4th.

This is the Post’s coverage of the announcement of the list of candidates from May 13th.

You’ll notice that of 14 paragraphs the Post feels it necessary to dedicate seven to the fascist BNP: A party which has 0 seats in the city and is fielding eight candidates out of a possible 23 seats and who’s highest share of the vote at the last election was less 20% in St George East with 560 votes.

The article’s top headline “BNP fields more candidates than ever” is an interesting choice, too. Why not “Greens field more candidates than ever before” and report how the Greens (who already hold one seat and may pick up another this time) are standing in all seats for the first time. Or, “Respect party fields more candidates than ever”?

And why does Ian Onions feel it necessary to give us four paragraphs of detail from the fascists’ manifesto and no mention of any other party’s policies?

Are the Post actually trying to big-up the fascists’ chance of doing well in the election by giving them disproportionate coverage?

If they are going to give the BNP disproportionate publicity why not mention their links to terrorism and Nazi-criminals? Why not point out the recent revelations about their links with the KKK and a South African racist murder? Why not mention the fascist ideology of the BNP and it’s lineage through the National Front to the British Union of Fascists? Why not quote the BNP’s founder that “Mein Kampf is our Bible”?

In fact, the Post seem pathetically scared of upsetting the BNP. We’ve recently seen a copy of a letter sent to the Post’s editors by a local antifascist campaigner asking why the Post refuses to print letters or statements from ant-racists which expose the BNP’s fascist heritage and ideology. The campaigner claims that the Post regularly edits out of letters any mention of the criminal convictions of the BNP’s leaders and those Nazi quotes that Nick Griffin wants us all to forget about. What’s the matter, Post? Have you fallen for the BNP’s propaganda that they are a normal, respectable political party? Are you scared of upsetting those BNP supporting readers?

It certainly seems from recent coverage that the Post is almost hoping for success for the BNP; not because the Post’s journos and editors support the fascists, I’m sure they don’t. But rather, because it makes an interesting story; a bit of controversy and conflict, a bit of reader reaction to fill the letters pages and comments section of the website.

There is a problem with a local corporate rag which is focussed primarily on sales and profits. Their political ‘neutrality’ actually hides the contradictory forces at play: the desire not to upset the status quo, their powerful friends and contacts; and the desire for conflict and disruption to give them something to report, something to provoke a reaction from their readers and shift papers.

The result of this fake-neutrality is that the paper isn’t on the side of ordinary Bristolians, at all. Political neutrality actually translates into a partisanship on the side of sales and profits, and fuck the consequences for the rest of us.

About these ads

Tags: , , , , , ,

8 Responses to “Post plays with fascist fire”

  1. SC Says:

    “It certainly seems from recent coverage that the Post is almost hoping for success for the BNP; not because the Post’s journos and editors support the fascists, I’m sure they don’t.”

    You may be wrong there my friend, I’m aware that at least one out-BNP member was working for the evening post until he was exposed very recently and is currently suspended.

  2. mike Says:

    Perhaps the Evening Post is coming to realise that British people are fed up with mass imigration . with millions of houses being built on our green belt. destroying our wildlife with not being able to find a job .with imigrants going to the front of the queue for housing. with our quality of life going down..etc..

  3. Fred Says:

    “It certainly seems from recent coverage that the Post is almost hoping for success for the BNP; not because the Post’s journos and editors support the fascists, I’m sure they don’t. But rather, because it makes an interesting story; a bit of controversy and conflict, a bit of reader reaction to fill the letters pages and comments section of the website.”

    Which is exactly what you have done …

  4. Fred Says:

    Because uou’re also making a big thing about a BNP story. Why? Because you think it might interest your readers. And that’s fair enough. It’s the nature of the beast. In your critique of the EP, you don’t report that there was a classified ad on page 60 because it’s just not interesting. However, a BNP story quite often is. It’s why the EP published it and why you then followed it up.

    The problem I have with this blog is that you can say anything you like, libellous or whatever, but you’ll never end up in court because you are not willing to be accountable for your statements, ie by saying who you are.

    But anyway, you have your political agenda to follow so you may as well get on with it. Hardly anyone (judging by the small number of comments) is reading this blog anyway.

  5. Ben Smith Says:

    Fred. I’m nothing to do with with this site, but I just wanted to say:

    “You’re a dick”
    :D

Comments are closed.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: